With litigation over section 220 demands becoming more frequent and contentious, the Supreme of Court Delaware weighed in an en banc ruling and affirmed shareholders’ rights to inspect a company’s books and records. In this protracted dispute which we’ve previously blogged about, AmerisourceBergen Corporation took the Chancery Court’s ruling allowing shareholders the right to inspect
Pharmaceutical company Gilead’s “overly aggressive defense strategy” received the ire of Vice Chancellor McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery, who found in a recent decision [$$] that shareholders easily showed they had the right to access books and records to investigate possible wrongdoing in connection with Gilead’s marketing of HIV drugs, and allowed the
Shareholder rights (at least in Delaware) include the right to inspect the books and records of the company for a “proper purpose”. What is a proper purpose? We’ll be covering a number of cases in the coming months on this oft-contested issue. For today: enter Woods Tr. of Avery L. Woods Tr. v. Sahara Enterprises
AmerisourceBergen Corp. has asked the Delaware Supreme Court to reverse a Chancery Court ruling allowing shareholders the right to investigate the company’s books and records for corporate wrongdoing in connection with the opioid crisis. Amerisource Bergen argued before the full five-member panel that Vice Chancellor Laster’s prior ruling went too far and invites harassment.
Books
As COVID-19 continues to cause uncertainty in M&A transactions, investors should have a heightened interest in pursuing the rights available to them, including appraisal and inspection rights.
For instance, the Harvard Law Forum expects that buyers who agreed on transaction terms at pre-COVID-19 valuations might seek to terminate those transactions or renegotiate the price
In a lengthy decision, Delaware Vice Chancellor Laster ruled that shareholders had the right to inspect the formal board materials of AmerisourceBergen Corporation and conduct a 30(b)(6) deposition to determine whether they needed additional documents, including informal board materials and officer-level documents.
In Lebanon Cty. Emp. Ret. Fund v. AmerisourceBergen Corp., stockholders sought to
Corporate shareholders possess important inspection, or information rights, in most jurisdictions. In Delaware, inspection rights are codified under Section 220 of the DGCL. Inspection rights provides shareholders with a “proper purpose” the ability to review certain “books and records” of the company. Both the proper purpose criterion and the breadth of the books and records