Header graphic for print
Appraisal Rights Litigation Blog

Category Archives: Entitlement to Appraisal

Subscribe to Entitlement to Appraisal RSS Feed

“Appraisal Risks Factor High”

Posted in Appraisal Conditions, August 2016 Amendments, Entitlement to Appraisal, Merger Price

Cooley LLP highlights that increased appraisals are being factored into mergers.  Following up on a previous piece, Cooley LLP notes that appraisal costs can be large, referencing the over $50 million added to the merger price in Dell, and further comments on the rise of appraisal claims, which Cooley calculates as a 267% increase from… Continue Reading

Note on the Dell Entitlement Ruling

Posted in Entitlement to Appraisal, Share-Tracing Not Required, Voting Against the Merger

The Vanderbilt Law Review published this note on Vice Chancellor Laster’s disqualification of stockholders in Dell who had inadvertently voted in favor of the merger, about which ruling we’ve posted before.  This note breaks down that ruling and discusses the court’s strict requirements for appraisal procedure and its affirmation that share-tracing is not required of… Continue Reading

Does the Appraisal Remedy Discipline Corporate Management?

Posted in Appraisal Arbitrage, Appraisal-Eligible Deals, Distinct from Fiduciary Duty Claims, Entitlement to Appraisal, Market-out Exception, Merger Price, No Proof of Wrongdoing Needed

In a March 2016 working paper, Corporate Darwinism: Disciplining Managers in a World With Weak Shareholder Litigation, Professors James D. Cox and Randall S. Thomas detail several recent legislative and judicial actions that potentially restrict the efficacy of shareholder acquisition-oriented class actions to control corporate managerial agency costs. The authors then discuss new corporate governance… Continue Reading

Delaware Chancery Disqualifies Lead Petitioner in Dell Appraisal

Posted in Entitlement to Appraisal, Voting Against the Merger

On May 11, Vice Chancellor Laster issued an opinion in the Dell case denying the T. Rowe Price lead petitioner’s entitlement to proceed with its appraisal case on the grounds that it (inadvertently) voted in favor of the merger, when it should have abstained or voted against.  The ruling did not address the underlying valuation issue,… Continue Reading